jajajaja

[quote]VISTA ES MAS RAPIDO[/quote]

[quote]Theo de Raadt, pionero del software libre, dice que Linux es basura[/quote]

[quote]Según Raadt, la comunidad de personas y empresas que mejoran y soportan a Linux no trabajan realmente con una intención de ayuda al mercado, sino "por odio a Microsoft". De igual manera señaló que dichas personas debería darse cuenta que "Linux es una basura y deberían arreglarlo".[/quote]

[quote]Let's go over some random thoughts during the installation of the 3 Operating Systems shall we:

1.

XP -Professional
1.

Tried and true, you are comfortable here
2.

Easy to install, use, manage and setup games on
2. Vista Home Premium

1.

Install is actually easier then XP Pro
2.

Once installed, its time to fumble around
1.

Where are my network drives
2.

I don't see my download directory
3.

Will FireFox work? (yes it does :P)
4.

Oh crap, this application won't load
5.

Need to get drivers for my Logitech mouse, nope, nothing on their site
6.

The Marvell Yukon NIC works, but not very fast
3. Ubuntu Edgy Eft (6.10)

1.

Install is the fastest of the bunch
1.

Wow, detected my mouse buttons fine
2.

Internet works great out of the box
2.

Now the fun begins
1.

wait, Office is already installed? (Open Office)
2.

FireFox too?
3.

I can't find the launcher to that new program I installed
4.

which Wiki do I use to install the ATI drivers?
5.

Wait my screen is skewed to one side, how do I fix that?
3.

Remember, its not harder, its different

My overall impression of the installations themselves are rather immaterial. Ubuntu installed the fastest and included several packages that had to be added after the fact for the other OS's. Unfortunately, once installed, Ubuntu took the longest to get to the point of running the tests (once again, I am an XP user for the most part). Let's look over each OS as it relates to getting them test ready.

Ubuntu

There are many many sites to assist you in getting all sorts of programs running on Ubuntu; the unfortunate thing is there are many many sites to get you going on Ubuntu. While information is great, too much information becomes time consuming as you have to filter out all of the information to find what fits your needs the best. Once you get Ubuntu going and you become comfortable with the interface, its actually not any harder then Windows. In fact when it comes to updating the OS you get a bonus; it updates all of your packages too (unless you tell it not to), this all with a few clicks, a password and boom, your done. Oh and no REBOOT needed...

There are a few hoops you must jump through to get games running on Ubuntu (as with any Linux Distro), OpenGL being the first and foremost of the bunch. While I have read many discussions on ATI's lack of support for Linux, I must say I was impressed with the ease at which I was able to get OpenGL working just fine with an ATI video card, one that ATI just got a Windows XP driver that included it (not to mention Vista and OpenGL are yet to be available). I did not get into any games outside of OpenGL as I felt it was not part of this article to see Ubuntu's performance in an emulation environment.

XP Professional

While XP was slightly behind Vista in that Vista installed quickly and I was able to “fumble around” Vista due to a somewhat similar layout to XP. XP's long installation time (in comparison to the others) and reboots that are required for joining your network domain etc (where the files live) is what hurt it here. XP is the old blue (background) that we are used to, when it came out it was flashy, that has since worn away (although there are pkg's you can get to alleviate that). Maintaining the programs you have installed and the OS is still somewhat cumbersome and by no means free. Any updates to the OS and most applications require the dreaded reboot...

Installing the games and applications needed for this article was painless and something we at VL are very accustom to, once again, most of the installations required some sort of reboot to make them active.

Vista Home Premium

Vista was the 2nd fastest to install and overall the fastest to get to the point of Test operational. I confess that I have used Vista RC1 and RC2, so some of the mundane things like finding your download files and Network folder I already had in my bag of tricks. Things like renaming your workgroup to match mine were somewhat more difficult and time consuming. Also time consuming, and frustrating at times, was the very little bit of information on the web about Vista and resolving issues (kind of the opposite issue of Ubuntu). When I had a problem running a program I went searching, I found several answers for XP Pro, and of course none of those worked. I finally found the answer (in this case “run as administrator”) but not by a web search, by a friend who has been using Vista for a couple of months solid. This issue should alleviate itself as Vista is in the hands of users for a longer length of time.

Installation of the battery of tests was slightly harder then that of XP due to a few glitches here and there. The most difficult amazingly was UT 2004, in which I had to install the UT2K4 update 4 times before it worked properly. Adding to this pain was the only way to test if the the update worked was to go into the game and see if you could move, if not, exit and apply again. There are still reboots required (and even some recommended that I just ignored) for Vista though it is no where near as frequent as XP. Audio and NIC Drivers (which Vista actually had at build time but were not efficient by any means) did not require a reboot, just to name a couple.[/quote]

[quote]Aun no pruebo VISTA, las pruebas con virus las hago en mi laboratorio cuando tengo mucho tiempo y por ahora ando super ocupado.[/quote]

jajaja dios no puedo seguir aqui... me estoy matando de la risa... :D :D :D

El Ajedrez es deporte, arte y ciencia. Analizada jugada a jugada la partida es una Ciencia; en su conjunto es una obra de Arte; a nivel competitivo es un Deporte.
(Carlos Torre, Gran Maestro mexicano)